• Impressionist/Modern (and The Surreal) Plus Post War & Contemporary – London 2017

    By Lance Rehs

    This year, things got started a bit late… I read a few reports that the auction houses pushed things off for various reasons, one of which blamed the Chinese New Year. The most likely explanation however, is that they were buying themselves some time to set up these sales. Remember, both Christie’s and Sotheby’s had Impressionist and Modern Sales pushed back into late 2016 in New York and the offerings were mediocre with borderline decent results – at that point, they attributed the timing to the US election). Now just a few months later, they are scrambling to fill in a blockbuster evening sale – not an easy feat.

    Paul Gauguin

    We’re going to take this all the way back to late February when Christie’s kicked off the series of sales on the 28th with their Impressionist and Modern Evening Auction (and The Surreal Sale). The top spot of the evening went to Paul Gauguin’s Te Fare (La maison) at £20.3M ($25.2M – Est. £12-18M), though it is said that the owner (Russian billionaire Dmitri Rybolovlev) took a huge hit as the work was supposedly purchased for a whopping $85M – but that is another story. Well behind was Matisse’s Jeune fille aux anemones sur fond violet at £8.4M ($10.4M – Est. £5-7M – this same work sold in 2006 for $6.86M) and Picasso’s Joueur de flûte et femme nue at £4.6M ($5.7M – Est. £6.5-8.5M).

    Henry Matisse

    The only big failure came at lot 22 with Rodin’s Le baiser, grand modele failing to find a buyer, estimated at £4-6M; 4 additional lots failed to sell yielding a 90% sell through rate. The total take for the evening was £93.5M ($116.1M), falling just under the top end of their £65.8-96.7M range. When we add in the Art of the Surreal sale, that bolsters the evenings total to more than £136.8M – that figure includes two works by Magritte, one of which set an auction record for the artist at £14.4M and the other not far behind at £10.2M ($12.7M … Rybolovlev paid $43.5M for it in 2011).

    Pablo Picasso

    Looking across Piccadilly, Sotheby’s was up on the 1st and oh boy they did not disappoint. Well above all the others on the evening was Gustav Klimt’s Bauerngarten – expected to bring in excess of £45M, bidding pushed its way above the £47M ($59M) mark. That price is a record for a landscape painting by the artist and is the third highest price ever paid for an artwork at auction in Europe. While Sotheby’s reported the sale with an anonymous buyer, it is being said the work was purchased by a foundation in Austria to replace recently restituted works. In a distant second was Picasso’s Plant de tomates at £17M ($21M – Est. £10-15M) and falling into third was Modigliani’s Portrait de Baranowski at £16M ($19.8M – Est. $10-15M). Rounding out the top 10 were quality works by Gauguin, Pissarro, Degas and a handful of other Picasso’s. Though there were 4 works that did not sell, only one should be seen as a big blow to the sale – a nice Sisley estimated at £5-7M failed to find a buyer. The Surreal Art was less impactful here as the Impressionist and Modern covered their £134.1-176.5M estimate, bringing in £177.2 – when we add in the Surreal Art, that total jumps to £194.8M. (Please note that charts have been converted to $USD).

    Peter Doig
    Mark Rothko
    Jean Dubuffet

    Post War & Contemporary

    Shifting our attention to the Post War and Contemporary Sales… I have to say I am a bit surprised there were no “blockbuster” lots being offered up. Christie’s was up first and their top spot went to Peter Doig’s Cobourg 3 + 1 More at £12.7M ($15.5M – £8-12M). Second went to Rothko’s No. 1 (1949) at £10.6M ($13M – Est. on request) followed by Dubuffet’s Être et paraître at £10M ($12.2M – Est. £7-10M). Other big names including Rauschenberg, Calder, Basquiat and Warhol all had works surpass the £2.5M mark – the sale totaled £96.3 ($117M – Est. £67.5-101.6) selling 56 of the 59 offered (95% sold).

    Sotheby’s had a similar sell-through rate but far exceeded Christie’s sales figure, as they were expected to. The top lot came quickly with Gerhard Richter’s Eisberg, bringing £17.7M ($21.6M) on an £8-12M estimate. A Basquiat took second, though it fell short of its £14-18M estimate, finding a buyer for just £11.9M ($14.5M). Filling in the top three was a new auction record for Georg Baselitz with his work Mit Roter Fahne (with Red Flag), which brought £7.5M ($9.1 – Est. £6.5-8.5M). Again, the standard evening sale characters filled in the remaining top 10 – Christopher Wool, Calder, Kippenberger, and Rothko all got in on the auction action. In the end, 57 of the 61 (93.4%) works sold for a total take of £118M ($143.7M – Est.  £80.9-112.6M).

    These sincerely seem like decent sales… a high percentage of the works sold, there was decent competition for works and pieces that did sell made solid prices. I guess some of those concerns over Brexit are waning. Now we’ll just have to wait and see how things shake out in May when Sotheby’s and Christie’s take their shot on our side of the pond.

     

    Conflicting Reports – Does It Really Matter?

    By: Howard Rehs

    During the month of March, we were treated to the release of two art market reports … one by TEFAF and the other by Art Basel. It has always been my belief that the art market is unique, and unlike the financial markets, there really is no accurate way to analyze it … so why bother? Ok, maybe some information is better than none. But then again…

    After each report was released I received emails from various readers and clients asking for my thoughts. I will say this: these reports might be fun to read (if that is your thing), but there is no way that right now someone will be able to accurately assess the depth and breadth of the art market. It is not a regulated market and the details of most transactions will remain in the deepest/darkest crevices.

    When it comes to valuing the overall market, and comparing one year to another, there are so many factors that come into play: how many works become available, the condition of those works and any changes since the last time they were offered, the number of times have they been offered, their importance in both the artist’s career and the history of art, when the specific work was created, etc., etc. etc. How can anyone account for all of these factors? And let’s not forget a crucial one … no two works of art are the same, no matter how similar they appear to be.

    After looking through the reports I noticed another flaw … they do not contact all the art dealers and auction rooms in the world … so this leaves a lot of missing data. On top of that, do you really believe that private dealers, or even privately held auction rooms, are going to tell the truth when they fill out the questionnaires? I highly doubt it. And just think of how the data can be, and is, manipulated/misrepresented … here is just one scenario:

    Dealer A has a painting worth $5M and Dealer B has a client for the work. If a deal is struck how is that $5M sale reported? Odds are, Dealer A states he made a $5M sale and Dealer B also states he made a $5M sale. In my mind this is one transaction; however, with both dealers claiming a $5M sale, it is not being reported accurately and there is no way to control this.

    Anyway, just for fun here are a few highlights from each report:

    TEFAF’s Art Market Report was the first to be released. In years past, Dr. Clare McAndrew conducted the research however, this year Clare moved over to Art Basel and the TEFAF research was conducted by Prof. Rachel Pownall (you can read her 224 pages if you have some spare time). Basically, the report paints a picture of a stable and resilient market, experiencing positive growth with total sales of $45 billion (up 1.7% from last year). It was also noted that the market experienced a decisive shift in sales … moving away for the auction forum to the dealer/private market. Auction sales were $16.9B (down about $4 billion, or 18.8%, from 2015) and the global mix was 62.5% dealer to 37.5% auction illustrating that the dealer market is benefiting from buyer confidence stemming from greater access to information and transparency on prices, preferring to buy through dealers than at auction. Privacy and anonymity, cherished in the Western world, in times of austerity and political tensions. Guess that is good for us!

    Later in the month Art Basel (Dr. McAndrew) released their findings and the size of the market was very different (you are also welcome to read her 286 page report). Dr. McAndrew pegs the number at $56.6 billion (down 11% from the previous year), with auction sales at $22.1 billion (down 26% from the prior year and industry leaders, Sotheby’s and Christie’s, losing 4% of their market share) and dealer sales reached $32.5B, up 3%. She claims that: in 2016, aggregate sale by dealers accounted for a larger share of the market at 57% by value, with auction sales comprising 43%. In addition, while sellers see geopolitical risks adding to uncertainty for 2017, buyers are viewing art and antiques as a relative safe haven amidst volatility elsewhere. This should increase prices for works that do appear on the market. I guess that is good as well.

    So, we have total market sales at $45B vs. $56.6B, auction sales at $16.9B vs. $22.1B and dealer sales at $28.2B vs. $32.5B. I do not know about you, but with spreads like that I walk away wondering if these reports can be taken very seriously. As I mentioned earlier, these reports only canvas part of the art market and according to the reports Art Basel contacted 6500 dealers and had a 17% response rate while TEFAF contacted about 7,000 and had a response rate of only 5%. Are those numbers really enough to come away with an accurate assessment of the market?

    If you want a complete understanding of the methods used and all the data complied, you need to read the full reports which are very long and include a lot of nice charts and graphs … I have always been told that people love colorful charts and graphs! What I take away from these reports is that the art market is very big and until worldwide regulations are put into place (which will probably never happen) we will never know how big it really is. Oh, just in case you are wondering, according to both reports the United States is still the biggest market – top in the Art Basel report at 40% and 29.9% in the TEFAF report … another BIG spread!

    In the end, I will keep on saying this – buy what you like, make sure it is a really nice example, in good condition, from the right period and try not to get caught up in the hype and statistical B.S.

    Lance Rehs

    Lance Rehs

    Lance Rehs is a 4th generation Art Dealer, the Vice-President of Rehs Galleries, Inc. and the Director of Rehs Contemporary Galleries, Inc. With a background in Finance, his earliest ventures in the art world included reviewing and analyzing various auctions from around the world in order to gauge the health of the art market, in addition to educating others about the art world from behind the scenes. Today, Lance continues to help shed light on the opaque dealings of the art world while giving an honest and unbiased opinion of the auction arena through Rehs Galleries’ monthly Comments On The Art Market. Rehs Galleries specializes in 19th and 20th Century European paintings, including but not limited to Barbizon, Realist, Academic and Impressionist art. Rehs Contemporary focuses on Contemporary Academic Realism; showing works that demonstrate superior technical skills and classical training.

    No Comments Yet

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published.

    You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

    Social media & sharing icons powered by UltimatelySocial